Sp*rs 1*-1 Arsenal: By the numbers

22

These derby matches are miserable affairs. I highly doubt anyone who says otherwise is telling the truth.

The nerves, the expectations, and how much hangs in the balance with bragging rights and table positions makes for an incredibly difficult match to watch for a fan. Today was no different, there wasn’t a time in this match where things ever felt comfortable watching it.

All that, you could see that they Arsenal players gave their all in this one (they were pretty clearly out of energy in the last 10 minutes) and if not for some poor refereeing, and some poor finishing that could have made the bad calls irrelevant, Arsenal could (should?) have come away with all three points. Instead Arsenal gave Sp*rs their first draw of the season and did well to get an important point in the top four race (the undrawables is very much a store brand invincibles and it would have been perfect for them but oh well).

It feels like two points dropped but given the option of a draw before kickoff I would have taken it.

On to the stats.

Sp*rs 1*-1 Arsenal: By the graphs

Running xG

xG Shot Map

Shot Placement xG Map

Simulated Match Result

Sp*rs 1*-1 Arsenal: By the numbers

5 – Big chances for Arsenal, 2 of these were the penalty and the resulting rebound. Still 5 of 9 shots classified as big chances is among the highest ratio I’ve seen in a match.

2 – Big chances for Sp*rs, 1 of these was from the offside penalty. The other was the great save by Bernd Leno.

17 – Touches in the box for Arsenal, of which 8 turned into shots. That is 47% of the touches turning into shots! That’s really good.

29 – Touches in the box for Sp*rs, of which 6 turned into shots. That is just 21% of the touches turning into shots, Arsenal did well to bend but not break on defense.

26% – Pass into the box completion percentage for Arsenal. Nacho Monreal led the way for Arsenal with 3 completions of 4 attempts.

44% – Pass into the box completion percentage for Sp*rs. Danny Rose led Sp*rs with 3 completions of 4 attempts. Christian Eriksen was the most wasteful, completing just 2 of his 7 attempts

54% – Final third pass completion percentage for Arsenal. Henrikh Mkhitaryan led the way for Arsenal with 10 of 16.

61% – Final third pass completion percentage for Sp*rs. Kieran Trippier led Sp*rs with 19 of 26.

1 – The number of players on Arsenal who passed above 75% today and that was Lucas Torreira at 86.7%.

24% – The percentage of Arsenal’s passes that were long.

18% – The percentage of Sp*rs passes that were long.

19.6 yards – The average length of Arsenal’s passes in this game, the longest average for the season and 2.6 yards longer than their average overall coming into this match.

19.4 yards – The average length of Sp*rs’s passes in this game,  1.9 yards longer than their average overall coming into this match.

This wasn’t a match of the highest technical level. It was a reminder of the old style with quite a lot of playing long and bypassing the midfield. Much of that was down to both teams pressing well, Sp*rs going through an injury crisis and Arsenal defending a lead. It is still taking some getting used to, to see Arsenal play in this way but I think that you can say that in this match it was effective.

The other thing that I found interesting was how efficient Arsenal were at turning their dangerous possession into shots in this match. This is typically what other teams have done to them but Arsenal took that playbook and pushed it to the next level. They allowed Sp*rs to have most of the possession but executed the bend but don’t break defense to perfection, after the 70th minute, Sp*rs were only able to muster just 1 shot (the penalty) and really never looked dangerous. Arsenal on the other hand looked like they could inflict damage at any time they countered. They converted 47% of their touches in the box into shots was amazing, having 4 of those 7 shots (non-pen) classified as big chances is even better.

Arsenal Strikers are wasteful in front of goal

1.14 – The expected goals for the 3 shots for Pierre-Emerick Aubameyang. 0.19 for the counter attack shot right after coming on in the 61st minute, 0.78 for the penalty and 0.17 (0.8 unadjusted for being part of the same shot sequence as the penalty) for the blocked shot after the penalty.

0.94 – The expected goals for the 2 shots taken by Alexandre Lacazette. 0.38 for the volley on the turn (this was a harder chance than it was rated) in the 2nd minute and 0.55 for the cutback chance in the 53rd minute.

For me this is the biggest story of the match. Yes the referees were bad (see below for that) but Arsenal really did more than enough to create chances that should have seen them collect all three points. Aubameyang has been going through a run of form where he is getting good chances but not finishing them and this match continued that. Lacazette has been finishing above his expected goals for the season (+2.1 for the season) but today he had a big bit of regression come all at once.

Arsenal’s biggest strength is their abundance of attacking talent, and specifically at striker, today they didn’t deliver on the chances that fell to them and it cost Arsenal two points.

An aside/rant on referees

1 – Offside clearly missed by the linesman, on the very very dumb foul committed by Shkodran Mustafi

1 – Encroachment by Jan Vertonghen missed by the linesman, on the rather poor penalty taken by Pierre-Emerick Aubameyang (my shot placement model says that is saved 38% of the time)

1 – Red Card foul missed by Anthony Taylor on the reckless and dangerous attempt by Danny Rose.

Not the best day for the officials. To be fair, I understand the level of difficulty in doing this as being a referee is one of the things I do in my spare time. It’s a hard and thankless job. Mistakes happen (just like with players) but the lack of ideas in trying to give help to referees is what really makes me mad.

It is crazy to me that with a field of play as large as their is in football that one referee is expected to cover everything in the center all by himself with only one assistant on either side. There should really be another official in the center and an additional two on the touchlines for these top level matches. Even if VAR is seen as a bridge to far more eyes and more help is needed to cover a game that has gotten so fast and so high stakes. /end rant

@oh_that_crab

Sources: Opta via Whoscored, Statszone and my own database

22
Leave a Reply

avatar
newest oldest most voted
MeSoHornsey
MeSoHornsey

The one thing a linesman has to do is be in line. The one thing. And he wasn’t.

Damo Dinkum
Damo Dinkum

I was only slightly disappointed about the missed offside on the penalty, that was a tough one. But missing Vertonghen being EASILY inside the box before he saved them with that block is bloody disgraceful. Took away the 3 points that we deserved.

GraeB
GraeB

I agree, he was almost ahead of Auba for Pete’s sake. Not quite sure if Iwobi encroached too but it certainly wasn’t to that extent.

BigArse
BigArse

So p*ssed at the officials and Mustafi, and irritated with Auba and Laca’s missed chances, but it was a very good performance. Let’s keep it going and try to finish our Europa tie off at Rennes in the first leg, then crush Man U at home next weekend. We are really playing well and have every chance at a European trophy and/or top 4 if we keep it up.

Futsboller
Futsboller

Why footballing authorities refuse to bring the game into the 21st century with respect to technology and officiating is beyond me. The only professional sport that can’t be bothered to make the right call. Poor decisions, flat-out getting-it-wrong, can cost a club a Champions League place, or a trophy. Imagine our weekend had Kane been rightly called offside today?

But it’s not even a matter of technology or VAR or more officials on the pitch — the ref doesn’t even call the same game with consistency (Rose studs Leno in the chest, yellow card; Torreira studs Rose on the leg, red card). Pathetic.

martin
martin

It’s coming next season and is used in the Europa League. Pity it has taken so long

GraeB
GraeB

I await the system being tested before making a decision. It seems like it will slow the game considerably and allow officials to cop out.

Also it becomes a negative only, with decisions being sought to cancel goals but not enable positive results because play will already have stopped.

Futsboller
Futsboller

I always find that perspective so puzzling — you’d accept your team to lose a match (perhaps a very important one) because of a bad call rather than sit patiently for a minute while the officials make the correct call? I find the game as a whole is perennially slowed down by this belief that technology interferes with the flow of the match, rather than improving the accuracy with which the officials can ensure it accords with the rules. The notion that a single official can call the game correctly on the pitch, with the aid only of two linesmen off the pitch, without the benefit of video review or a second referee on the pitch, is absurd and well, well behind the times. The only thing that makes this at all comical is the fact that we can sit in our armchairs at home and see, with absolute clarity, within a minute of the play, how right or wrong the referee got it.

GraeB
GraeB

But those of us in the ground are not allowed to know what’s being looked at or why! At least in rugby everything is out in the open.

Absolute clarity? Pundits spent all day arguing about the events at Wembley and still disagreed with each other and the “video ref” in the studio. There at least 5 decisions which would have required review at up to 3 minutes a pop.

It will be interesting to see how much the FA with a whole weekend to review will make of Torreira sending off, Rose, Xhaka, Sissoko non sendings off whilst not being able to reverse Spudz penalty.

My other point, say the lino had flagged Ramsey offside and the ref stopped play, there is no way to reverse that whatever video evidence.

Bob
Bob

“My other point, say the lino had flagged Ramsey offside and the ref stopped play, there is no way to reverse that whatever video evidence.”

When VAR is in place there is already protocol for this. If the lino has any doubt he shouldn’t flag and let VAR check for him. So, the scenario you mention should be avoided.

GraeB
GraeB

UEFA ruling only, not applied in EFL this season, so who knows.

Futsboller
Futsboller

Despite some biased wankers out there, I think it is universally clear on Monday that Kane was offside and the penalty should not have been awarded (Mustafi’s shoulder would not have gone into his back if Kane didn’t have the step on him), and Auba’s penalty should have been retaken due to Vertonghen’s significant encroachment and subsequent block of Auba’s followup tap in.

So, you are not willing to sit an additional dramatic 15 minutes in your seat in order to see Arsenal given their deserved 3 (6, actually) points?

The end result of the Premier League remaining decades behind other sports in their officiating/application of the rules is that teams like Arsenal can lose upwards of 30-60 million pounds (depending on what the CL spots are valued at these days) on games like these in which the officiating team simply cannot make the right calls on the pitch. We lost incredibly valuable points on Saturday not because the almighty Pochettino and Tottenham Hotspur performed better than we did; lost incredibly valuable points because the officials could not apply the rules of the game accurately and precisely. As a fan of Arsenal and of the wider sport, I do not accept that.

shokim
shokim

Exactly, well said. Tennis has Hawkeye and yet PL is still lagging so far behind. It boggles the mind that we’ve to tolerate terrible officiating season after season.

SB Still
SB Still

So disappointed with the result. It really frustrating that but for a combination of errors by Mustafi (unnecessary action), linesman (that was bloody offside!) and Ref (soft penalty), we would have been a point off Spuds and ahead of ManU!

Credit to Emery and the team for the performance and makes us feel that an away draw is frustrating rather than relief.

GraeB
GraeB

Correct about offside but hardly soft penalty especially as ours equally soft? The red card for Torreira actually allows us an appeal – see what that brings! I thought both Rose and Torreira worthy of yellows only as ball was there to be won.

Hi-brid
Hi-brid

…and Torreira did indeed win the ball very cleanly. The follow through was actually negligible and milked by Rose. Allowing Vertonghen a 4-yard head start to make the goal line clearance from Aubemayang’s follow-up was absolutely criminal.

Chris Siple

Thanks for the insights. Wasn’t Leno’s double save really two big chances, though?

N10
N10

Thought the same.

Scott Willis
Scott Willis

It’s a good chance but because it’s a bit further out and it is through a crowd it doesn’t quite qualify for the “big chance” definition.

I thought that was a great save whatever it is classified as.

Stephen
Stephen

No excuse for missing the encroachment. There’s nothing else going on.

N10
N10

I relish everything about the derby, very far from a “miserable affair”. Weird comment.

Scott Willis
Scott Willis

I find it so stressful. There is so much on the line in these. But that’s just me maybe