Wenger calls for an end to toothless Financial Fair Play system

37

Arsene Wenger, long an advocate of Financial Fair Play, now believes that the system should be scrapped, because it is unable to enforce the rules it put in place.

Clubs, nation states, oligarchs and limp administration from the powers that be have made what was a good idea now something of a joke.

This summer’s business, in particular the Neymar transfer to Barcelona, have shown FPP to be more or less toothless and the Arsenal manager says questions have to be asked of a system which appears to be fundamentally flawed.

“Financial Fair Play raises new questions,” he said. “I always did plead for it. Today, I am not convinced that we can maintain it. Football is maybe only at the start of a huge financial investment.

“It has become the most powerful sport in the world. It means do we have to open the door completely to investments? It is a question we have to raise because, aAt the moment, it looks like we have created rules that cannot be respected.

“There is nothing worse than when you create rules that are not respected.”

Ultimately, Wenger believes FFP is essentially a bust, and should be done away with.

“Do I want to get rid of financial pair play? I think so because there are too many legal ways to get around it,” he continued.

“The question, at least, has to be raised. At the moment, it looks like you can buy clubs in China and get the players there, and buy them in other clubs, then get them, after, here.

“You can get around FFP. Am I convinced that, at the moment, the rules are strong enough to make it respected? I’m not sure.”

Much of Arsenal’s financial outlook has been based around the self-sustainable model and respecting the issues that FFP tried to address. If it is scrapped, there will undoubtedly be pressure on Arsenal’s billionaire owner Stan Kroenke to start acting like someone who genuinely wants the club to be successful, and help it compete.

We won’t be holding our breath though.

guest
37 Comments
oldest
newest most voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Rich
Rich
2 years ago

After years of holding back money and waiting to strike when FFP came in, we’re now holding back money because we can’t spend it due to wage rules created by FFP.
Welcome to Arsenal.

John C
John C
2 years ago
Reply to  Rich

And inflation has halved it’s value, something else that was predicted by me at least.

Too Drunk To Be Offside
Too Drunk To Be Offside
2 years ago
Reply to  Rich

Frankly Wenger needs to focus more on on field issues. This ‘system is broken’ narrative that he has been on about in recent days doesn’t work when you are struggling on the field. First he ranted about how the transfer system in January needs to go, then about FPP. He could be right, probably is right, but right now with the situation the team is in, this points don’t come across as being powerful and more like the system is rigged excuse every unsuccessful person makes. First get things right on the field and then talk all you want about… Read more »

Northerngooner
Northerngooner
2 years ago

I couldnt agree more, TooDrunk. It’s almost as if Wenger is trying to deflect attention elsewhere.

FFP rules have nothing to do with how the team is coached or how players contracts are handled.

ramgooner
ramgooner
2 years ago

@Too drunk to be offside.

I agree with you. But, the Lacazette goal is onside and the system on field is also rigged.
So, technically we wouldn’t be in the so called “crisis” if the goal at Stoke wasn’t ruled offside.

Too Drunk To Be Offside
Too Drunk To Be Offside
2 years ago
Reply to  ramgooner

I saw the game, and it was offside. JUST, but offside. Also a crisis doesn’t come because of one poor decision.

The crisis was after Anfield. Even if Arsenal had held on for a draw at Stoke, it would still be a crisis after Anfield.

The Blerch
The Blerch
2 years ago

If FFP were to be scrapped it might make Premier League clubs open to massive investment by owner groups- in which case, Stan’s lack of interest in ponying up would see Arsenal’s position in the league and share price tumble. He wouldn’t want to see his investment fail (I know we’re not doing well at the moment but from his point of view, at least the share price is stable)- so he’d be more likely to try and sell up. Convoluted, but not exactly a worse case scenario for Arsenal fans

Don Cazorleone
Don Cazorleone
2 years ago
Reply to  The Blerch

To a point, though the market value of his shares only matters for as long as he might want to sell. His model at the moment doesn’t look like capital increase through share value (otherwise he’d be investing to ensure that happens), instead it appears to be dividend payments from the business, which for as long as there’s cash flow being generated, will be maintained. Now I’d have to check their annual report, but dividends usually aren’t paid as a ratio to their worth as much as a company will propose to pay X amount per share. So for as… Read more »

Crash Fistfight
Crash Fistfight
2 years ago
Reply to  Don Cazorleone

But officially, Arsenal haven’t been paying dividends to shareholders, no? Unofficially, a £3m consultancy is a drop in the ocean in comparison to the value of the shares/Kroenke’s net worth.

I don’t get it, although I don’t profess to understand it. Why wouldn’t he try to increase the value of his investment – surely that would see a higher return than just milking off a tiny proportion of profits?

PaulS
PaulS
2 years ago
Reply to  Don Cazorleone

Nope, there are no dividend payments. His investment is all about asset value, which has nearly doubled since he became majority shareholder in 2011.

Crash Fistfight
Crash Fistfight
2 years ago
Reply to  PaulS

I’d just assumed that he was happy for the share price to rise on the basis of the increased TV deals that keep happening, in which case it doesn’t matter if the team gets better or not. Still, being more successful would increase the value of the club even more, and it’s not that difficult to make changes – just tell the CEO to do his job and remove the power from the team manager. I don’t see how keeping Arsene as manager was the easy solution – it’s not like Kroenke has to do anything himself, he can just… Read more »

Oberon
Oberon
2 years ago
Reply to  The Blerch

Depends on who he sells to.

Paul
Paul
2 years ago

So how is football going to cope with any downturn? Just because things have shot upwards doesn’t mean that they will continue. Neymar’s transfer fee is crazy for example (plus Mbappe). Salaries are crazy.

When fans get sick of the richest teams/countries buying success, fans get sick of giving cash to overpaid stars they have no affinity with, owners and TV companies not pumping more money into teams, an economic downturn or similar the whole situation will go pop.

Just because things go up doesn’t mean they can’t head downwards.

Eni
Eni
2 years ago
Reply to  Paul

Don’t see that happening any time soon. Don’t forget that the club’s have more and more reach day by day. For that to happen, it will take another decade or 2 at least.

btw
btw
2 years ago
Reply to  Paul

Yeah, I would hope the money paying fan base gets disgusted by increasingly plastic football, but it might be giving humanity too much credit. I am thinking of dropping my modest ~25 gbp a month streaming account because I don’t consider watching Arsenal to be value for my money. With a little patience and media blackout I can watch it for free on Arsenal player the next day. I miss living in California where the time difference meant I could download the torrent and watch the game later the same day, those were the good old days when Arsenal were… Read more »

Rich
Rich
2 years ago
Reply to  Paul

The talk is that either Google or Facebook will come in for the worldwide rights for PL+CL football? they’re apparently monitoring our interests with A.I and seeing where? And how they can extract the most value from its interest worldwide? I think football will continue to live in its own bubble, the popularity of this sport is going nowhere. Once you get fans on your site? to a global audience you can then sell advertising whilst brainwashing the globe with whatever hidden agenda they feel like. This is the way the worlds headed and there’s nothing we can do about… Read more »

Pedant
Pedant
2 years ago
Reply to  Rich

In the end it comes down to fans. If we stop going to matches, buying sports channels and replica shirts then it all goes pearshaped.

Arsenal fans seem more pained that most currently so we are more at risk.

Rich
Rich
2 years ago
Reply to  Pedant

That’s all very well and good. But realistically? Can anyone honestly say they could turn their back on football? At least 40% of my non-work related thoughts revolve around football. The vast majority of my work conversations revolve around football. My social circle revolves around going to football games, or going to the pub or friends houses to watch football. When I’m on the internet and not watching porn, I’m reading about football or watching football. There would be a pretty large void and one of the few and greatest pleasures removed from my life if I boycotted the game… Read more »

Piggyslasher@gmail.com
2 years ago

Is there any way to sue Stan Kroenke?

Pete
Pete
2 years ago
Reply to  arseblog

Wearing a Tom Selleck moustache.

Ox in the Box
Ox in the Box
2 years ago
Reply to  arseblog

For hurt feelings, apparently

Possession
Possession
2 years ago

‘Limp administration from the powers that be’
Snouts in the trough I reckon.

Crash Fistfight
Crash Fistfight
2 years ago
Reply to  Possession

**cough**Platini**cough**

David Hillier\'s luggage
David Hillier\'s luggage
2 years ago

Given we bet it all on FFP, I’m not sure why we didn’t play the political game when we had the chance. Surely being probably the biggest and most vocal club championing FFP’s worth at the time of it’s inception we could have wormed someone into a position of influence or made some powerful allies? FFP wouldn’t have restricted us employing a political strategist with a strong understanding of finance – they’re not on £7m a year, they’d be on real world salaries, less than what a young professional football earns. Instead a club who were doing fuck all when… Read more »

Lazarus
Lazarus
2 years ago

The only way forward is caps on transfer fees and wages.
Make it a balanced sport rather than trophies brought which is the case now.
But then again for all their billions PSG and Man City won fuck all last year.
Many be throwing money at a problem is not a solution either…

Rich
Rich
2 years ago
Reply to  Lazarus

They can’t under EU law restriction of trade is illegal.

Alexis Signitplease
Alexis Signitplease
2 years ago

If Wenger knows there are legal ways to get around FFP, why isn’t Arsenal exploiting them, like our competitors?

gooner
gooner
2 years ago

Stoke and Wesbrom know how to get around it?

Rich
Rich
2 years ago

Because other clubs have sponsorship deals that are through their owners, so well above market rate.

Johno
Johno
2 years ago

I think we rolled the dice on FFP hoping it would allow us to compete in a fairish manner. There is an argument that still that a club like Arsenal can spend more than they West broms or Burnleys of this world even under FFP.

However like in real life its easy to circum-navigate through loop holes or whatever so, I agree its either strictly enforced or removed entirely.

Al Gilmore
Al Gilmore
2 years ago

We can all be wise after the event. When we decided to move to the Emirates we fully believed it would put our revenue and therefore spending power on a level footing with most major clubs. It wasn’t a fanciful idea. But shortly after the plan was irrevocably set in motion, CFC were bought by a Russian oligarch and football has never been the same again. And again we can all seem very clever when we say Arsenal should operate like Chelsea, etc. But here’s a bit of perspective since RA bought CFC they have won pretty much every thing… Read more »

Lucas
Lucas
2 years ago
Reply to  Al Gilmore

Interesting read. I also find the way arsenal deal very bad. The constant need to haggle and leave things to last minute has always come to bite us (bar the ozil deal). We’ve over paid transfer price wise and wages for second/third choice players and then we have trouble offloading them. See Perez for example. If only we acted faster on Lemar…

Canador
Canador
2 years ago

Why is this man always shifting the blame of his failings to other places?…it is never AW’s fault.

Jack Action
Jack Action
2 years ago

Isn’t it fairly simple what needs to be done? Outlays on player transfers/salaries has to be capped at 70-75% of team revenues, the revenues composed of match-day ticket sales, tv money, player sales, prize money i.e. Champions League and merchandising… no sponsorship money because that’s how City and PSG can lie about financial earnings. If you do that then big teams can stay big, but smaller teams have a route forward as well.

Santori
Santori
2 years ago

We have been naively led up the promise path

Why not
Why not
2 years ago

As much as some extra investment would be good and so. I think a sustainable Arsenal goes beyond the FFP ideology and im fully behind it

I hate the idea of having Stan as a suggar daddy though.