Thursday, December 19, 2024

Report: Arsenal close in on sleeve sponsorship deal

According to Goal.com’s Arsenal correspondent Chris Wheatley, the Gunners are close to agreeing a £10 million a year shirt sleeve sponsorship deal with an ‘on demand video subscription service’.

The Premier League sanctioned the introduction of the new shirt advertising opportunity ahead of the current campaign with several clubs agreeing on lucrative partnerships. At the time of writing, 11 top flight clubs have shirt sponsors including Liverpool, Man City, Chelsea and Everton.

The terms of Arsenal’s shirt and stadium sponsorship deal with Emirates precluded them from signing a similar deal in the summer, however, those terms were renegotiated in February. 

Given we’re trying to shape up our commercial arm, this additional revenue will obviously come as a boost. Rumour has it that we’re also actively looking for a new shirt supplier with Adidas tipped to succeed Puma.

While we don’t know who the new shirt sleeve sponsor might be, it’s interesting to note that the popularity of video on demand services, offered by companies such as Netflix, Amazon and Sky (NOW TV), has surged in recent years, facilitated by the rise of internet-enabled smart TVs and devices like Google’s Chromecast and Amazon’s Fire Stick.

There are suggestions that these new players could, in time, challenge the likes of BT Sport and Sky for the rights to broadcast live Premier League games. Last year Amazon outbid Sky for the UK rights to show the ATP World Tour tennis and to live audio-stream Bundesliga football commentaries in Germany.

Interestingly, the Telegraph report that two packages containing entire rounds of Premier League matches for 2019-2022 remains unsold two months after the auction began.

In February, Sky and BT Sport purchased 160 of the 200 games per season made available. 40 games per season remain up for grabs. Will those get snapped up by an on-demand provider? It could be the start of a broadcasting revolution in the UK if so.

Related articles

Comments

Subscribe
Notify of
guest

34 Comments
oldest
newest most voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Glocken

Looking forward to having PornHub on the sleeves of the shirt next season ?

Gio

OrnHub?

Pedant

Sounds possible as I gather that:

‘Amongst all digital video services, Rentals or subscription-based services (SVoD) have the second highest penetration rate.’

Anonymarse

Second highest behind pornhub presumably

Gudaffiduck

Glocken let’sleave it out yeah

Anne Noyd

Ah the wizard’s sleeve

Anonymarse

Does that mean they’ll have it playing on the big screen at the Emirates?

Mayor McCheese

There’s porn on the internet?

Anonymarse

That’s mostly what the internet is for

Dave
Anonymarse

There must be a lot more surface area on the arms, legs and face where we can fit more adverts surely

yen

Oh what a relief it would be if we could watch at least some PL games outside of the UK with original commentary with a single click of a button, not having to refresh streams and going through all those ridiculous ads.

Dream stuff.

Goonerink

Dream on pal!

Anne Noyd

To be honest anyone who pays for a Sky/BT subscription in this day and age of hd online streams is a complete and utter moron in my book. Why the hell would you? It’s not as if the UK product is even that good – with their reluctance to show highlights from other games and wall-to-wall advertisements – you’re getting the absolute bare minimum. The US shows have half-time goal highlights of every single premier league game for god’s sake. British punditry is also at an all-time low. Listening to Wio and Fwank last night killed off more brain cells… Read more »

Bosscielny

Have you listened to the pundits in US? If you think Rio & Frank are bad, wait till you listen to the likes of Alexi Lalas & Steve Nicol.

Maniac

Lalas’ banter is legendary. Love listening to him.

Paul

I’m happy with BT Sport for a fiver a month rather than clicking x’s on streams!

Mentalist

Acestream

Nketibag

Moron!

Amusa

Just hope if someone like Amazon or Netflix gets the rights. It’s for the whole campaign. Won’t mind paying 30 40 quid to get access to all the games in the season.
But paying 30 quid to sky for 20 games, 30 to BT for 10-15 games and another 30 quid to Netflix etc just to watch all Arsenal games will be a bummer.

UncleEddie

WELL so interestingly I did read that at some point in the new future (2020?) Sky and BT will be able to sell each others channels on their own platforms.

so essentially you’ll only need a single subscription. Now that is a lot more palatable and I wouldnt mind an extra 30 per season or 2.99 per game if that was what Netflix/Amazon etc offered for the remaining games

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-42364401

GraeB

BT already show on Sky platform, BT just charge more to watch it via there.

Be nice if the money went to ground items like a decent sound system where we could actually hear what is being said in those half time interviews or AW team selection announcements. Or maybe reduce food/drink prices. Surely someone needs to figure out ways to get people into those empty seats.

Maybe I’m just suffering from seeing sunshine for the first time in weeks!

David Hillier's luggage

I don’t think the BT/Sky deal will have a massive impact on the consumer – the way I read it, Sky will be able to sell BT Sport channels as part of a Sky package(ie at an additional cost) and BT customers will be able to buy NowTV passes directly through their BT package (ie an additional cost).

It will streamline the process for the customer, but doubt it will save us that much cash. Very much a deal to try and consolidate the market than disrupt the industry.

Goontang

Trying to shape up our Commercial Arm.

bystander

10m a year might not sound like a lot (in football terms), but given the PL’s wage restrictions, it will very useful – new commercial income is one of the few ways in which Arsenal are allowed to fund wage increases. So a shirt sponsor could pay the wages of a new Mkhitaryan/Aubameyang type signing.

David Hillier's luggage

Totally. As much as I don’t care for them aesthetically, a sleeve sponsor pretty much pays the wages for a summer signing.

It would also be the biggest shirt deal in the league (Obviously I’d expect Utd to have bigger deal when they eventually get a sleeve sponsor)

yen

If I had a bus company, I would definitely go for that.

David Hillier's luggage

Don’t we still have a broadcast partnership deal with BT Sport (which seems to just give the channel free reign to mock our defeats in adverts and not actually create any original Arsenal content)? Wouldn’t a sleeve deal with a steaming service be in conflict with this, particularly if it’s Sky owned NowTV?

Georgeycharles

Well, an extra £10m certainly won’t do any arm.

Dan

Commercial arm! It was a good one!

Gooner777

Half of that gone on Xhaka’s wages alone.

LEFT08

Put what you like on the sleeve, as long as it’s the sleeve of a beautiful new adidas shirt.

The Old Git's Whistle Test

I have no problem with sleeve, neck tattoo, fat Arse sponsorship as long as the fans get something from the deal as well as the club, I know, a dream!

The opportunity to subscribe to an Arsenal only season ticket online /tv would get my vote as long as it was at a reasonable fee and not Sky/BT over- pricing.

Fingers crossed.

David Hillier's luggage

I’m calling it now. My guess is Hayu will be the sleeve sponsor. Arsenal’s commercial department aren’t great, I doubt they would have been able to broker a deal with one of the major international services (Netflix or Amazon), NowTV are Sky owned and the club already has a broadcast deal with BT Sport, can’t be BBC as that’s public, niche services like Curzon, Bfi or Shudder don’t have the cash and are in a different market, which leaves you with… trashy reality TV service Hayu (owned by Universal who already have a tie up with Arsenal). I really, really… Read more »

Share article

Featured on NewsNow

Support Arseblog

Latest posts

Latest Arsecast

34
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x